Feature
Why can't Hollywood fcuking spell?
Movie Feature
Ali
6th October 2012
Time to report on a movie trend that's more terrifying than any unnecessary helicopter or diagonal title treatment: the fact that spelling standards are seemingly slipping throughout the film industry – from props and in-film graphics to promotional materials, posters and beyond. This inability to use proper spelling and grammar is more damning to Hollywood than any film directed by Peter Berg ever could be.
Here's the Avengers Assemble Blu-ray, sitting on my desk. It's only the biggest film of the year. "I wonder," I wondered, "if, given the terrible job Disney did at releasing the film in the UK – complete with a mangled title, a dearth of proper extras and the wrong cut of the film on the disc – there might be a typo in the blurb?" Hey, guess what?
Harumph. It's only a small error, but one that a half-decent sub-editor would pick up in an instant. For your reference, Avengers Assemble sold over a million DVDs and Blu-rays in the UK in its first week, each one a black mark against whoever wrote, approved and signed off that text.
Nowadays, these errors are fairly common. Magic Mike – a huge success in America and overseas – received blanket marketing in the US and the UK, yet a 30-second TV spot broadcast in the States still managed to contain a full-screen typo. Despite only containing eleven words.
A spelling error in marketing is one thing. A spelling error actually IN a film is another entirely. For example, did you notice the typo in the second biggest movie of the year? Christopher Nolan has a reputation for being a perfectionist, but even he didn't notice this stonking great spelling error in a newspaper prop in The Dark Knight Rises.
I shudder to think of how many high-ranking people that prop must have passed through before it made it onto thousands of cinema screens around the world. The propmaster. The cast members. The graphic artists. The editor. The director. Any one of the movie's nine producers. I can't begin to fathom how much damage the old adage has done: "I before E except after C" indeed. Someone sack The Gotham Times' sub.
Though such sloppiness is inexcusable, big tentpole studio pictures like Batman movies are up against the clock, so you can perhaps understand why quality control may not necessarily extend to the minutiae. But if that's the case, how do you explain the hack-job done on the Blu-ray release of Alfred Hitchcock's Frenzy?
The movie's opening credits are not only littered with typos like 'ficticious', but some actors' names are even spelled incorrectly. Surely even a cursory check would have highlighted these egregious errors? This is a case of someone taking something which once was right, and in 'improving' it, making it woefully wrong. You can guarantee the rights-holders for Frenzy won't be knocking themselves out to issue a re-authored version either.
If you think getting an actor's name wrong is unforgivable, how about citing a film via an incorrect title? In an odd show of tautology, the first poster for Neil Jordan's vampire thriller Byzantium proudly claimed to be 'From the filmmakers of Interview With A Vampire', apparently unaware that Jordan's movie concerns the grilling of the definitive article: it's an Interview With The Vampire, not just any old vampire. I can understand Neil not getting a look at his own movie's poster – it was hastily deleted and replaced with the corrected version – but of the two film names on the one-sheet, 50% of them were wrong. YOU HAD ONE JOB, POSTER GUY.
I'm aware that blaming 'Hollywood' for these errors is a bit like blaming Steven Spielberg when your Jurassic Park DVD gets scratched from overuse (random example), but marketing departments act as an extension of the studios and an extension of the talent: bad spelling reflects poorly on everyone. No one enjoys looking like a dunce.
Whether it's Quentin Tarantino 'intentionally' misspelling "Inglourious Basterds" on his cover-sheet or just an intern not paying proper attention when typing up copy, spelling mistakes are the easiest way to show an audience you don't respect their intelligence. Frankly, it makes all involved look like a bunch of cnuts. Sorry, typo: cunts.
Support Us
Follow Us
Recent Highlights
-
Review: Jackass Forever is a healing balm for our bee-stung ballsack world
Movie Review
-
Review: Black Widow adds shades of grey to the most interesting Avenger
Movie Review
-
Review: Fast & Furious 9 is a bloodless blockbuster Scalextric
Movie Review
-
Review: Wonder Woman 1984 is here to remind you about idiot nonsense cinema
Movie Review
-
Review: Borat Subsequent Moviefilm arrives on time, but is it too little, or too much?
Movie Review
Advertisement
And The Rest
-
Review: The Creator is high-end, low-tech sci-fi with middling ambitions
Movie Review
-
Review: The Devil All The Time explores the root of good ol' American evil
Movie Review
-
Review: I'm Thinking Of Ending Things is Kaufman at his most alienating
Movie Review
-
Review: The Babysitter: Killer Queen is a sequel that's stuck in the past
Movie Review
-
Review: The Peanut Butter Falcon is more than a silly nammm peanut butter
Movie Review
-
Face The Music: The Bill & Ted's Bogus Journey soundtrack is most outstanding
Movie Feature
-
Review: Tenet once again shows that Christopher Nolan is ahead of his time
Movie Review
-
Review: Project Power hits the right beats but offers nothing new
Movie Review
-
Marvel's Cine-CHAT-ic Universe: Captain America: Civil War (2016)
Movie Feature
-
Review: Host is a techno-horror that dials up the scares
Movie Review