Feature
A Japanese lesson for Aaron Sorkin
TV Feature
Ed Williamson
5th September 2012
He can dash off ten pages of clever, snappy, Oscar-winning dialogue in about three minutes, but when it comes to the basics of Japanese grammar? Very poor, Sorkin. See me.
It seems the only way he could think of to get actors to rattle off his words any quicker than usual was to do a chunk of them in Japanese, and so in episode 6, 'Bullies', we saw Olivia Munn's character, Sloan Sabbith, ask TEPCO spokesman Daisuke Tanaka in Japanese for a quote on the status of the Fukushima reactor. He admitted to her off the record that it could potentially rise to radiation level 7, but then wouldn't admit it on air, prompting her to lose her rag and announce it anyway.
Later on Charlie came up with a way for her to keep her job and the spokesman to save face: the Japanese words for four ("shi") and seven ("shichi") sounded very similiar, he said, and all she need do was put out a statement saying she'd confused the two.

"Shichi!" "Gesundheit!" etc etc
But Sorkin, you BELL-END, here's the problem: as Sloan points out, there is another word for each number ("yon" and "nana" respectively). What she doesn't mention is that a native Japanese speaker would never use "shi" or "shichi" in relation to a unit, like centimetres, kilograms or a radiation level: they'd always say "level yon" or "level nana". It's like the difference in English between "oh" and "zero": you'd never say radiation was at "level oh".
So (a) Tanaka would never have said "shi" or "shichi" (we don't hear that part of the conversation, but Sloan doesn't correct Charlie's presumption that he did) and (b) no Japanese person is going to believe Sloan's cover story, which means THE WHOLE THING FALLS APART.
I mean, for fuck's sake, Sorkin, everyone knows that. Now write it out a hundred times.
Oh, but first, could you write more episodes of The Newsroom please? It's brilliant. Sorry to bother you.

Follow us on Twitter @The_Shiznit for more fun features, film reviews and occasional commentary on what the best type of crisps are.
We are using Patreon to cover our hosting fees. So please consider chucking a few digital pennies our way by clicking on this link. Thanks!
Support Us

Follow Us
Recent Highlights
-
Review: Jackass Forever is a healing balm for our bee-stung ballsack world
Movie Review
-
Review: Black Widow adds shades of grey to the most interesting Avenger
Movie Review
-
Review: Fast & Furious 9 is a bloodless blockbuster Scalextric
Movie Review
-
Review: Wonder Woman 1984 is here to remind you about idiot nonsense cinema
Movie Review
-
Review: Borat Subsequent Moviefilm arrives on time, but is it too little, or too much?
Movie Review
Advertisement
And The Rest
-
Review: The Creator is high-end, low-tech sci-fi with middling ambitions
Movie Review
-
Review: The Devil All The Time explores the root of good ol' American evil
Movie Review
-
Review: I'm Thinking Of Ending Things is Kaufman at his most alienating
Movie Review
-
Review: The Babysitter: Killer Queen is a sequel that's stuck in the past
Movie Review
-
Review: The Peanut Butter Falcon is more than a silly nammm peanut butter
Movie Review
-
Face The Music: The Bill & Ted's Bogus Journey soundtrack is most outstanding
Movie Feature
-
Review: Tenet once again shows that Christopher Nolan is ahead of his time
Movie Review
-
Review: Project Power hits the right beats but offers nothing new
Movie Review
-
Marvel's Cine-CHAT-ic Universe: Captain America: Civil War (2016)
Movie Feature
-
Review: Host is a techno-horror that dials up the scares
Movie Review