Feature
Opinion piece: Everything's awful when you're a snob
Movie Feature
Ali Gray
2nd July 2014
In a frankly unbelievable turn of events this week, two properties which have been successful in the past continued to be successful. For reasons yet to be determined, various parties are disgusted by the fact that Transformers: Age Of Extinction and Mrs Brown's Boys D'Movie made so much money at the box-office, satisfying their respective audiences of young people and old people. The school of thought seems to be that audiences shouldn't spend money on movies they want to see – they should spend money on movies we want them to see.
Because the general public are, by and large, not fussy in the slightest. Mrs Brown's Boys regularly pulls in over 10 million views in its primetime slot on BBC One. It won a BAFTA in 2012. And though it resembles a particularly cheap and not especially funny spoof of the sitcom from Ricky Gervais' series Extras, it is phenomenally popular – because quality and success don't necessarily go hand in hand. Is it so hard to believe that Mrs Brown's Boys' audience would follow Brendan O'Carroll's character from the small screen to the big? And is it really that upsetting to you that they did?
The success of Transformers: Age Of Extinction is even less surprising, given that the three movies in the franchise that preceded it have made a combined worldwide box-office total of $2.6 billion. The fact that it broke records with a neat $100 million opening weekend in the US and a worldwide take of $300 million should come as a shock to no one. I haven't seen Age Of Extinction – although I'll admit it's more suitable to the IMAX treatment than, say, a bloke dressed as a woman – but it seems like more of the same: more robots, more explosions, more girls in shorts, more cringeworthy dialogue, more teenagers emerging from cinema screens hyped up on the cinematic equivalent of Red Bull. Critics rated it 17% on Rotten Tomatoes. Audiences gave it an A- rating on Cinemascore and voted with their wallets. The gulf between the professionals and the public is widening.
July 11th sees the release of Richard Linklater's Boyhood, an incredible body of work amassed over 12 years of filming – alas, it's a beautiful and unique film that's likely to be steamrollered by the continuing march of the Dinobots. Today, US movie blog Slashfilm posted an intriguing-sounding article with the headline '107 Reasons You Need To See Richard Linklater's Boyhood', except when you clicked through, you were met with the following text:
"You really need me to list 107 reasons to see this incredible film? You went and paid $15 bucks to see Transformers: Age os [sic] Extinction in 3D even though you hated the other Transformers films and saw all the bad reviews in your twitter stream… but you can't just take our word on this epic indie film?
"You've already heard us rave about this film many times over the past six months… But you haven't bought ticket yet…"
Transformers: Age Of Extinction has a massively broad appeal – that's kind of its thing. Boyhood is an incredibly niche title. Both have a 165-minute running time: one spends that time rewriting the history of the world via the medium of dancing cars and robot dinosaurs; the other ambles along at a contented pace, showing every one of the 12 years it took to film. No one is expecting Linklater's film to reach as wide an audience as Michael Bay's movie. No one should be made to feel bad about seeing one film and not the other. The snobbery of this article is infuriating – particularly when one has to close a large site ad for Transformers: Age Of Extinction to read it properly.
If it's an attempt at satire, it falls flat: Slashfilm have run several 'X Reasons You Need To See…' articles in the past, including '40 Things I Learned On The Set Of Transformers: Age Of Extinction' earlier this year. And for those of you who are counting, Slashfilm have published at least 80 stories about the fourth Transformers movie compared to just 12 articles about Boyhood (which has been filming since 2002). But seriously though, fuck you for being excited about Transformers, you idiot! Support independent film!
You could argue that no one needs any number of reasons to go and see a Transformers movie: you know exactly what you're going to get. Boyhood, on the other hand? Now that's a film that could benefit from exactly the kind of coverage Slashfilm are parodying.
In a perfect world, Boyhood would be seen and loved by all and would match the box-office of Transformers and everyone would be happy. That's never going to happen. But can we at least stop pitting films against one another and get down to the business of celebrating cinema as a whole? The fact that $300 million-worth of people are even still going to the cinema in 2014 is cause for success. Boyhood will have a lifespan way beyond its 12-year shooting schedule, it doesn't need to rake in big bucks at the cinema and I'll wager Richard Linklater a) never intended it to do so, and b) cares little even if it does. Let Transformers have its record-breaking run. Let them eat robots.
Go and see Transformers: Age Of Extinction or Mrs Brown's Boys D'Movie this weekend. Go and see Boyhood next weekend. Or don't. I don't give a shit. But don't dare start throwing your toys out of the pram when a movie that is not to your liking finds a captive audience that doesn't include you. Such snobbery always leads to disappointment: if you're worried about the state of modern cinema, I have bad news for you – it looks like it's in the hands of the very people you're criticising.
Support Us
Follow Us
Recent Highlights
-
Review: Jackass Forever is a healing balm for our bee-stung ballsack world
Movie Review
-
Review: Black Widow adds shades of grey to the most interesting Avenger
Movie Review
-
Review: Fast & Furious 9 is a bloodless blockbuster Scalextric
Movie Review
-
Review: Wonder Woman 1984 is here to remind you about idiot nonsense cinema
Movie Review
-
Review: Borat Subsequent Moviefilm arrives on time, but is it too little, or too much?
Movie Review
Advertisement
And The Rest
-
Review: The Creator is high-end, low-tech sci-fi with middling ambitions
Movie Review
-
Review: The Devil All The Time explores the root of good ol' American evil
Movie Review
-
Review: I'm Thinking Of Ending Things is Kaufman at his most alienating
Movie Review
-
Review: The Babysitter: Killer Queen is a sequel that's stuck in the past
Movie Review
-
Review: The Peanut Butter Falcon is more than a silly nammm peanut butter
Movie Review
-
Face The Music: The Bill & Ted's Bogus Journey soundtrack is most outstanding
Movie Feature
-
Review: Tenet once again shows that Christopher Nolan is ahead of his time
Movie Review
-
Review: Project Power hits the right beats but offers nothing new
Movie Review
-
Marvel's Cine-CHAT-ic Universe: Captain America: Civil War (2016)
Movie Feature
-
Review: Host is a techno-horror that dials up the scares
Movie Review