Drugsnore Cowboy
Review: Project Power hits the right beats but offers nothing new
Movie Review
Director | Henry Joost, Ariel Schulman | |
Written By | Mattson Tomlin | |
Starring | Jamie Foxx, Joseph Gordon-Levitt, Dominique Fishback, Rodrigo Santoro, Colson Baker, Courtney B. Vance | |
Release | 14 AUG (UK) |
Luke Whiston
26th August 2020
Netflix is an odd one isn't it. In order to operate they need to attract a certain amount of subscribers, so cast a wide net of shiny mid-budget fare with no pretension the films don't exist to reel in the dollars. It's pure returns-driven broad entertainment, designed to appeal to as many people as possible but that leaves little cultural footprint. Other studios do this, of course - it is a movie industry after all - but the frequency of ho hum numbers generated by Netflix does nothing for their reputation as a production line serving up gruel, and the next announcement always comes with a twinge of doubt. Anyway I just watched this new Netflix film called Project Power.
The reason I've brought this up is due to Project Power screenwriter Mattson Tomlin's recent comment that he writes ten scripts a year, which sent parts of my social media into a frenzy of weird jealous existentialism: Am I writing enough? Did he get paid for them all? Does he expect to sell any? By Tomlin's admission they're not all masterpieces, but his work ethic has landed him a number of meaty projects, including a co-writing credit on Matt Reeves' upcoming The Batman. So you'd think Project Power would be an exciting insight into what Tomlin is capable of, and er, ah, um. Remember all that stuff I wrote just now about shovels and pyramids?
Project Power is a superhero movie. There are characters who use their powers for the greater good, some who do crimes, and then others who use their powers to seek personal vengeance. You know the drill. The difference here is that to access your superpower you have to take a pill, and everyone's superpower is unknown until they start using - for example good guy cop Frank (Joseph Gordon-Levitt) discovers he can become bulletproof, which is handy in his line of work. But using superpowers is taboo in this world, and so pill usage is a sort of analogy for drugs. Factor in a shady government-linked organisation flooding the streets with the pill/drugs, and you've got a whole load of half-baked social commentary to go with the half-arsed X-Men rip-offery.
If I sound cynical then that's because I can't escape the feeling Project Power was made for the cynical reasons mentioned in my opening paragraph. On the surface it appears to be a derivative of the most generic superhero movies the cape genre has to offer, with Netflix gambling on Gordon-Levitt and Jamie Foxx (he plays Art; an ex-soldier-cum-experiment survivor in the Wolverine vein, searching for a missing daughter) being big enough names to reel in audiences, or that people after a superhero fix will press play because the Disney/Fox stuff is no longer on the platform.
Beneath the surface there's... not a great deal, just well-worn story mechanics - all working perfectly in unison, but even the most precisely-tuned plot beats need that extra sparkle to prove a human being actually wrote the film for other humans. It's a shame the social commentary angle is left in the dust by the frantic pace of the action. The ethics of a cop taking performance-enhancing drugs is an interesting enough moral talking point, but here becomes a convenience to slot Frank neatly into where he needs to be. It all seems more like a calculated product than a movie.
To make matters worse, Project Power has been accused of bearing a number of similarities to an Indian superhero film, Iru Mugan. It would be a legitimate complaint if any element of either of these films sounded like something so brainbendingly original, it could only be a case of outright plagiarism or an astonishing coincidence. But no, the gimmick employed by both films is only a slight tweak on the usual superhero template to introduce conspiracy thriller aspects. Look, if we start debating succession and artistic integrity in the superhero movie genre we'll be here until the heat death of the universe, or MCU Phase 25 - whichever happens first - so I'd like to stop now please.
Support Us
Follow Us
Recent Highlights
-
Review: Jackass Forever is a healing balm for our bee-stung ballsack world
Movie Review
-
Review: Black Widow adds shades of grey to the most interesting Avenger
Movie Review
-
Review: Fast & Furious 9 is a bloodless blockbuster Scalextric
Movie Review
-
Review: Wonder Woman 1984 is here to remind you about idiot nonsense cinema
Movie Review
-
Review: Borat Subsequent Moviefilm arrives on time, but is it too little, or too much?
Movie Review
Advertisement
And The Rest
-
Review: The Creator is high-end, low-tech sci-fi with middling ambitions
Movie Review
-
Review: The Devil All The Time explores the root of good ol' American evil
Movie Review
-
Review: I'm Thinking Of Ending Things is Kaufman at his most alienating
Movie Review
-
Review: The Babysitter: Killer Queen is a sequel that's stuck in the past
Movie Review
-
Review: The Peanut Butter Falcon is more than a silly nammm peanut butter
Movie Review
-
Face The Music: The Bill & Ted's Bogus Journey soundtrack is most outstanding
Movie Feature
-
Review: Tenet once again shows that Christopher Nolan is ahead of his time
Movie Review
-
Review: Project Power hits the right beats but offers nothing new
Movie Review
-
Marvel's Cine-CHAT-ic Universe: Captain America: Civil War (2016)
Movie Feature
-
Review: Host is a techno-horror that dials up the scares
Movie Review