Review
Stoker
Movie Review
Director | Park Chan-wook | |
Starring | Mia Wasikowska, Nicole Kidman, Matthew Goode, Jacki Weaver, Dermot Mulroney, Lucas Till, Harmony Korine | |
Release | 1 MAR (US) 1 MAR (UK) Certificate 18 |
Neil
25th February 2013
Poor old Park Chan-wook. One minute you're the director of the blistering Sympathy For Mr Vengeance and Oldboy, the next you're the director of I'm A Cyborg, But That's OK and Thirst. What to do to regain your former prowess? The answer, obviously, is to make a new film in a language other than your own, from a script by a Prison Break actor, which on the surface looks like a remake of a beloved Hitchcock classic. What could possibly go wrong?
Uncle Charlie begins to drive a wedge between India and her mother, although they're already so estranged that it would have to be a wedge the size of a small town driven by, ooh, a really big wedge-driving thing to push them any further apart. Flirting with both women, Charlie appears to offer Evelyn something she hasn't had for a long time, while simultaneously arousing more than just the odd suspicion in India. Either that or she's just really itchy down below.
So far, so 21st century Shadow Of A Doubt, but that's about as far as the Hitchcomparisons go. As things take a turn for the sinister, the much-anticipated, deliciously labyrinthine storytelling which marks out Park's best work fails to materialise, replaced by an unsurprising sequence of events and an unsatisfying last-act reveal. And while Wasikowska is excellent as a real-life Wednesday Addams, Kidman is left with too little to do and Goode, though Goode, is not Goode enough. He needs to come across like a young Jack Nicholson, sexy and terrifying, but instead provides no more spunk or danger than a well-made table.
Fortunately Stoker does look absolutely incredible, and the synthesis of Park's remarkable visuals and his heart-stoppingly beautiful cast works to paper over some of the cracks in the story. Had this been a first feature, it would be a flawed but exciting debut that promised a bright future, but this is Park Chan-wook's ninth film, and it's increasingly obvious that he deserves better scripts to match his peerless aesthetic.
Like many auteurs, it's Park's curse that all his films will forever be compared to his masterpieces, but even as a standalone vehicle Stoker fails to incite the flames of its plot as much as its title suggests. "Sometimes you need to do something bad to stop you doing something worse," India reflects, and while Stoker is by no means bad, you've got to hope that making it stops Park Chan-wook misdirecting his talent on lesser films in the future.
Support Us
Follow Us
Recent Highlights
-
Review: Jackass Forever is a healing balm for our bee-stung ballsack world
Movie Review
-
Review: Black Widow adds shades of grey to the most interesting Avenger
Movie Review
-
Review: Fast & Furious 9 is a bloodless blockbuster Scalextric
Movie Review
-
Review: Wonder Woman 1984 is here to remind you about idiot nonsense cinema
Movie Review
-
Review: Borat Subsequent Moviefilm arrives on time, but is it too little, or too much?
Movie Review
Advertisement
And The Rest
-
Review: The Creator is high-end, low-tech sci-fi with middling ambitions
Movie Review
-
Review: The Devil All The Time explores the root of good ol' American evil
Movie Review
-
Review: I'm Thinking Of Ending Things is Kaufman at his most alienating
Movie Review
-
Review: The Babysitter: Killer Queen is a sequel that's stuck in the past
Movie Review
-
Review: The Peanut Butter Falcon is more than a silly nammm peanut butter
Movie Review
-
Face The Music: The Bill & Ted's Bogus Journey soundtrack is most outstanding
Movie Feature
-
Review: Tenet once again shows that Christopher Nolan is ahead of his time
Movie Review
-
Review: Project Power hits the right beats but offers nothing new
Movie Review
-
Marvel's Cine-CHAT-ic Universe: Captain America: Civil War (2016)
Movie Feature
-
Review: Host is a techno-horror that dials up the scares
Movie Review