Review
Thor
Movie Review
Director | Kenneth Branagh | |
Starring | Chris Hemsworth, Natalie Portman, Tom Hiddleston, Anthony Hopkins, Kat Dennings, Stellan Skarsgård | |
Release | 6 MAY (US) 27 APR (UK) |
Matt
20th April 2011
The main problem Marvel faces in rounding up its Avengers is this introduction to the Norse God of Thunder. Can Thor exist in Iron Man's more rational world of implausible tech and high-science? Well, the question seems to be: is a near-omnipotent, hammer-wielding space Viking any less believable than a billionaire shooting lasers from his flying robot suit? As it turns out, no. They're both utterly ridiculous. Now sit back, shut up and enjoy.
Here we see Thor (Hemsworth), the arrogant son of worthy king Odin (Hopkins), get tricked by mischievous runt brother Loki (Hiddleston) into starting a war with the Frost Giants, Asgard's cosmic neighbours. As a result, Odin takes away Thor's godlike powers (essentially ‘stealing his thunder') and banishes him from the kingdom. And so, as the Nordic superhuman crashes down to Earth, it seems we have completed our own crash course in Marvel's intergalactic ventures.
And yet, it doesn't end there. What follows is almost a dual storyline, as a powerless Thor struggles to recover his equally banished hammer on Earth, while Loki schemes up a growing threat of God-like villains and monsters back in the magical land of beards and gold buildings. The two stories interweave, of course, but the distinct separation, made clear visually by the magnificent set design and wondrous starscape of Asgard compared with the small, dusky New Mexico town, helps to simplify this rather brilliantly introduced grandiose fantasy, which, when you think about it, actually rates a Power Wizard Level 10 on the D&D scale.
Along with the modernised language (a tad surprising considering the comics' oft-used ‘thees', ‘thous' and ‘shalts'), Chris Hemsworth himself does a superb job of selling Thor as savvy Viking - he might not be fluent in human ways but thanks to the Asgardians' uncannily similar lifestyles, he already knows enough to get by and have a good time in the meanwhile. And, more importantly, fun is had at his expense, with the pomposity of such a self-righteous figure allowing for some great and unexpected funnies and one-liners.
The supporting cast are also all up to scratch, with 2011 all-starrer Natalie Portman turning in some great moments, making a potentially thankless role more substantial and aptly conveying chemistry with her ripped co-star. Hopkins, too, for the first time in quite a while, doesn't give an expected ‘phoned-in' performance, instead treating his booming character with the kind of respect he would give to the Shakespearian role that director Kenneth Branagh no doubt convinced him it was.
Special mention also goes to Tom Hiddleston as the slimy brother Loki, who, despite potentially having an entire cosmos in his grasp, is given far more in-depth and believable reasons for his treacherous actions than simply “I want to take over the worldâ€. In this, easily Marvel's most character-driven adaptation to date, Hiddleston plays the villain with a desperate sense of betrayal worthy of his character's motives.
Overall, the film is typical comic-book fare in places - there's some toothless CGI, some shoe-horned geek references and a crane shot of the lead character screaming “NOOOOOO!â€. Plus, the heavy layer of mythology applied to this character is the source of a lot confusion leading to a point where you're not sure whether Thor and his Mjölnir need to get to Yondheim or across the Bifrost with the Frost Giants. Or something like that.
At the same time though, rather surprisingly, this is one of the least camp of Marvel's efforts. Branagh and co have taken one of the least relatable superheroes and turned his story, not only into a hugely enjoyable, funny and visually spectacular film, but into a tantalising introduction to next year's The Avengers (make sure you stay after the credits for a great Avengers plot tease). Can Thor and Robert Downey Jr's Tony Stark exist in the same world? Pfft - soon enough they'll be in the same room, and that's going to be seriously fun.
Support Us
Follow Us
Recent Highlights
-
Review: Jackass Forever is a healing balm for our bee-stung ballsack world
Movie Review
-
Review: Black Widow adds shades of grey to the most interesting Avenger
Movie Review
-
Review: Fast & Furious 9 is a bloodless blockbuster Scalextric
Movie Review
-
Review: Wonder Woman 1984 is here to remind you about idiot nonsense cinema
Movie Review
-
Review: Borat Subsequent Moviefilm arrives on time, but is it too little, or too much?
Movie Review
Advertisement
And The Rest
-
Review: The Creator is high-end, low-tech sci-fi with middling ambitions
Movie Review
-
Review: The Devil All The Time explores the root of good ol' American evil
Movie Review
-
Review: I'm Thinking Of Ending Things is Kaufman at his most alienating
Movie Review
-
Review: The Babysitter: Killer Queen is a sequel that's stuck in the past
Movie Review
-
Review: The Peanut Butter Falcon is more than a silly nammm peanut butter
Movie Review
-
Face The Music: The Bill & Ted's Bogus Journey soundtrack is most outstanding
Movie Feature
-
Review: Tenet once again shows that Christopher Nolan is ahead of his time
Movie Review
-
Review: Project Power hits the right beats but offers nothing new
Movie Review
-
Marvel's Cine-CHAT-ic Universe: Captain America: Civil War (2016)
Movie Feature
-
Review: Host is a techno-horror that dials up the scares
Movie Review