Plotting a graph on the effectiveness of 2013's villainous names
Posted by Ali at 21:00 on 14 Aug 2013
The lack of truly evil names first occurred to me in April this year, when we all got acquainted to talking about Iron Man 3 baddie 'The Mandarin' like he was a truly epic foe, and not, say, a small citrus fruit. Tony Stark should be afraid of The Mandarin no more than he would be villains named 'The Cantaloupe' or 'Ya Pear'.
At least The Mandarin sounded a little exotic. The villain in Star Trek Into Darkness - that's a sci-fi that stretches to the far ends of the universe, featuring kaleidoscopic languages that would twist the tongue - was called 'John Harrison'. Here are some other names JJ Abrams rejected. Chris Jenkins. Steven Edwards. Pete Fowler. Alan Fordham. The universe trembles before Colin Cresswell. Kneel before Phil Cooper. You dare incur the wrath of the mighty Pat? And so on.
Underwhelming villain names is a trend that has continued throughout 2013, without so much as a 'the Wicked' or 'from the Planet Zyrax' suffix in sight. That is, until I saw Kick-Ass 2, which features a villain so outrageously named he makes General Zod sound like General Bod. With this new high benchmark to compare to 2013's low points, I plotted a graph of this year's movie villains and how much terror their names are likely to instil in the hearts of their enemies. If any.